The Fernley Reporter
Advocates for clean energy and energy efficiency applauded a unanimous decision by the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada to reconsider cuts to popular energy-efficient lighting rebates. Last year, the PUC ended rebate programs for LED lighting, despite the fact that efficiency programs save consumers money, reduce energy bills, cut pollution and create jobs.
“Improving energy efficiency saves money for homeowners, renters, and businesses now and into the future, and creates jobs in Nevada,” said Rudy Zamora, director of Chispa Nevada, a group dedicated to building Latino families’ power to fight for a more just and healthier future for the Silver State. “The PUC should support more energy efficiency programs, not eliminate them. We encourage the PUC and the utility to find ways to support energy efficiency among underserved populations. Low-income families, particularly those who are renting, often live in energy-wasting homes and apartments. We can do a better job ensuring Nevada’s low-income residents have easy access to energy savings, and energy-efficient lighting programs are a strong step forward.”
Nationwide, many electric utilities are implementing energy efficiency programs for their customers that include residential LED lighting. These LED lighting programs have consistently been popular with at all income levels, including renters and home owners.
The LED lighting programs adopted by NV Energy in the past were extremely successful. In 2015, the northern Nevada program achieved 196 percent of its energy savings goal and the southern Nevada program achieved 270 percent of its energy savings target. An independent analysis NV Energy completed in 2016 showed incentive programs greatly increase the purchase of LED lamps.
Chispa Nevada is a member of the RenewNV partnership. RenewNV is a partnership of organizations working to build and enhance Nevada’s clean energy economy.
Public Utilities Commission of Nevada opens discussion on popular energy efficiency program
- 02/10/2017 07:35 AM

COMMENTS
C
Comment author: Carl C. Hagen
Comment text: Maybe there is more to this story than what is reported, but it seems to me that the businesses that are causing this problem ought to be paying for this, or at least a major portion of it. Why does the County have to pay the whole bill? Just my opinion.
Comment publication date: 5/7/26, 10:26 AM
Comment source: Storey County, Tesla partner to extend I-80 Patrick on-ramp
Comment author: Alan Reeder
Comment text: Great guy, laughed easily, had fun with his students, enjoyed our time together at FHS!
Comment publication date: 4/23/26, 10:23 PM
Comment source: Howard David Jackson
Comment author: Jack & Nancy Cook
Comment text: Wonderful man. Created a precious family with Linda. Will always respect and admire his contribution to teaching at FHS.
Comment publication date: 4/18/26, 10:27 AM
Comment source: Howard David Jackson
Comment author: JeffDickerson
Comment text: Very well reported, even though our motion was denied.
Comment publication date: 4/15/26, 11:05 AM
Comment source: Judge allows Fernley City Council to proceed with corrective agenda item in Lau expulsion case
Comment author: Todd fossum
Comment text: Hi my name is todd fossum i'm clarence's stepson, I was wondering if he had any siblings. I think he said he had a sister that just survived cancer. If she can get ahold of me or any buddy, my number is 916. 3 4 3 1 1 7 7.Thank you have a blessed day
Comment publication date: 1/16/26, 4:33 PM
Comment source: Clarence L Shields
C
Comment author: Carl Hagen
Comment text: So just curious, what is the point of a franchise agreement if it is not exclusive?
Comment publication date: 12/15/25, 4:18 PM
Comment source: Council approves non-exclusive franchise agreement for waste collection
Temperature: 92°F Town: Fernley
Pressure: 1007 hPa
Wind: 4 mph
Comment
Comments