Go to main contentsGo to main menu
Friday, November 13, 2026 at 10:04 PM

Fernley Roots: The Fernley Castle

Source: By Kelly Brye
Fernley Roots: The Fernley Castle

Every week, I look forward to sharing special stories about the people and the history of Fernley.

This week, we celebrate the “Fernley Castle” located on Duffy Road and built by George “David” Duffy and his wife Margaret.

Located at 3011 Duffy Road, the castle was the brainchild of Mr. and Mrs. Duffy in the mid-1970s. George was an electrician by trade. Margaret was a popular schoolteacher who taught in Fernley and Wadsworth. The Duffys were a blended family of seven. Margaret had two boys, Mike and Scott Peterson. George had three children, Deborah, Monty and George Jr. They had two children together, a son John and the baby of the family, daughter Leeson. Speaking to Mike, John and Leeson for this column was a real treat.

The Duffys purchased a section of land, 640 acres, north of I-80 just east of exit 50 during the 1970’s. To this day, the children refer to this large chunk of property as “The Section.” Before purchasing “The Section,” the Duffys raised their family on a beautiful piece of property along the bank of the Truckee River in Wadsworth. (I can personally vouch that this is a beautiful home on a very scenic piece of land along the river. I was in it a few years back for professional reasons and the view impressed me.)

Work ethic and teamwork were a large part of childhood for the Duffy children. When the Duffys built the Wadsworth house, all of the children contributed labor and skill throughout the process. Mike Peterson tells of the old Chism Ice Cream factory in Reno that folded its doors. The building was being dismantled, which created an opportunity for Mr. Duffy to gather some resources for his home. The joists were made of premium lumber, and Mr. Duffy had his boys help him unload them in Wadsworth for their floor. They also gathered up a large load of 2x6 tongue-n-groove wood pieces that they utilized for their Wadsworth home’s subfloor and roof.

I suggested to Mike that his stepdad sounded like quite the smart fellow. He replied that George was a great electrician, but was always willing to learn new things. For example, when building the Wadsworth home, the time had come for plumbing to be installed. Rather than spend needless money to plumb the entire house, George negotiated a deal with a local tradesman to plumb one bathroom only. His plan was to watch and observe how to plumb and then do the rest of it himself, with the assistance of the boys. Mike recalls that George bought a case of beer for a friend and then learned how to do the plumbing himself. Roughly 13 at the time, Mike chuckles that he can still remember the name of the friend, Fuzzy Ratt.

The Duffys sold the Wadsworth home in 1970 and settled in their new section of land in the foothills north of I-80. Together, George and Margaret drew up their plans for the castle. John, who was 10 or 11 years old at the time, said George and Margaret were the architects, the designer and the construction team, all-in-one. George and Margaret were inspired to build the castle after visiting Stoke’s Castle in Austin, NV, a popular tourist attraction.

The castle is located on a bed of lava rock halfway up the rugged mountainside. A significant amount of dynamite was used to create a level surface for the soon-to-be castle. The crushed rock created from the explosive dynamite process would be used to form the walls. John, the youngest of the boys, fondly tells me that was in the good old days when anyone could go into town and buy dynamite, right off the shelves, at the local hardware store.

First and foremost, they had to build an underground dynamite “shack” or storage area for the dynamite, framed and covered with railroad ties to moderate the temperature during storage. John recalls operating a jackhammer at an early age. One blast at a time, they would jackhammer a hole or crevice in the dense lava rock to enable them to pack it with dynamite, sometimes three to four sticks at a time. They discovered a way of mixing water with the sandy soil in the bottom of the valley to create a clay-type material that would be compacted to cover the dynamite. This would enable the dynamite to explode inside the desired area as opposed to blowing out the wrong direction. Eventually, they would go as far as they could and were forced to call it good as the density of the rock became too difficult to remove.

John said initially his dad’s plan was to build an underground residence. It was the density of the rocky area and difficulty in continuing to further remove the hillside that led to the idea of constructing the castle. In 1978, construction began. The labor force consisted of George, Margaret and their kids.

They created forms, roughly two feet wide and four feet tall. They would fill their forms with large lava rocks created from their mountainside blasting, pouring concrete into the forms to cure and hold the rocks together. Once one row was complete, they would repeat the process and install new forms, rocks and concrete on the next level. The height of the current castle was determined by how high the backhoe loader could extend upward.

The castle was designed with turrets and parapets. Not to be confused with a tower, turrets are curved rooms built into a building, while towers start at the ground. Small slits were in these early turrets so soldiers could shoot arrows out of them. Turrets fell out of fashion when warfare changed. A parapet fortification, known as a breastwork when temporary, is a wall of stone, wood or earth on the outer edge of a defensive wall or trench which shelters the defenders. In medieval castles, they were often crenellated. In later artillery forts, parapets tend to be higher and thicker. John says his name is still engraved into the concrete on the easternmost parapet on the top levels of the castle.

Roads and a driveway had to be carved out to access not only the castle, but the entire section of land. The youngest daughter, Leeson, tells me proudly that her mom, the schoolteacher, loved to be on the dozer, which is still on display at the property. She also says her dad, George, was an electrician with a mining problem. Mining was his true love and hobby. He had mining claims in Lovelock.

The northernmost wall of the castle is the remnants of the mountainside they had previously blasted. Unless you’re inside the castle, you can’t see this portion of the building. The castle is 4,448 square feet. While much of the property in the section is still owned by the Duffy family, they were never able to experience it as residents. While the family had the main structure complete, time did not allow them to finish the roof or fine-tune the interior.

Three years into construction, Mr. Duffy was tempted to move back to his native state of West Virginia in 1980. The castle was sold and completed by the next owners, Willie and Phyllis Wolford. George and Margaret bought a dairy farm that also included some oil well deposits. Unfortunately, the timing was bad, and they were unable to hit their fortune due to the oil embargo and energy crisis. They ultimately made Fernley their home again, living out their years on the Section, but never once at the Castle.

Bruce Mull, long known in Fernley as a heavy equipment operator, was an active part of building and regularly grading what is known today as Duffy Road, named after George and Margaret Duffy. He said that every two years he would haul his grading equipment out there to scrape and level the gravel road.

While I was unable to speak with all of the children, I can share with you a common theme in visiting with Mike, John and Leeson. They were raised to participate and work hard with family projects, and they were taught to respect history and pay attention to details. It was an honor to hear their renditions of the family Castle and an even greater honor to share their story with you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

COMMENTS
Comment author: John Mueller Comment text: FERNLEY’S WATER EMERGENCY: FIVE QUESTIONS STILL NEED ANSWERS The November 12 Fernley Reporter article provides a good recap of the November 3 water emergency and the November 4 City Council meeting. First, credit where credit is due. Our city employees responded, restored operations, and took precautions to protect residents. That’s important and appreciated. But fixing the immediate problem isn’t the same as preventing it from happening again. There are five reasonable questions our community deserves answers to: 1. WHAT ACTUALLY FAILED? What was the root cause of the water treatment plant’s communication failure, and why didn’t the backup systems prevent the interruption? 2. HOW CLOSE WERE WE TO A REAL EMERGENCY? How much usable water remained in storage, and how close did we come to affecting essential services, including firefighting? 3. WHAT WILL THIS COST TAXPAYERS AND RATEPAYERS? What did the emergency cost, what additional repairs or upgrades are necessary, and how will they be funded? 4. WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING SURE IT DOESN’T HAPPEN AGAIN? Is there a written corrective-action plan with assigned responsibilities, measurable results, and completion deadlines? 5. HOW WILL RESIDENTS KNOW THE PROBLEM IS REALLY FIXED? Will the city publish an after-action report explaining what happened, what was learned, what has been corrected, and what still needs attention? This isn’t about pointing fingers or finding someone to blame. It’s about learning, improving, and protecting our community. We can appreciate the city’s response while still expecting transparency, accountability, and a commitment to continuous improvement. Some technical information may need to remain confidential for security reasons. But that shouldn’t prevent residents from understanding the risks, the corrective actions, and the results. The real question isn’t whether Fernley recovered from the November 3 emergency. We know it did. The question is: If the same failure happened tomorrow, would we be better prepared? That’s a conversation worth having. Our community deserves more than reassurance. It deserves measurable results. Comment publication date: 11/12/26, 1:54 PM Comment source: Fernley Council Addresses Water Emergency Comment author: Donald DeVold Comment text: Great article It’s actually spelled DeVold Thank you Comment publication date: 10/29/26, 4:58 PM Comment source: The great robbery: Strip-6 by Solis helps Vaqueros punch playoff ticket Comment author: CH Comment text: I want to start a betting 'pool' for the October, November, and December closures: 1. A dent in the pool slide. 2. A failed breaker. 3. A pebble loose in the water part (replacing all concrete) 4. Hurricane Polo makes a sudden turn and blows off the roof (again). With soft muscles after 7 months of no swimming, the only health left is my sense of humor :) Comment publication date: 10/1/26, 11:18 AM Comment source: Fernley Pool Renovation Moves Forward, One Test at a Time Comment author: PFB Comment text: Why can't you guys find competent contractors.. For a large municipal facility like the indoor-outdoor Fernley Swimming Pool located at 300 Cottonwood Lane, a complete ground-up commercial build or major structural renovation typically spans 6 to 12 months or longer when factoring in large-scale engineering, public municipal permitting, specialized commercial HVAC/roofing, and health department inspections. The current renovation has been- The Fernley Swimming Pool has been closed for approximately six to seven months since late February 2026 for a major roof replacement and facility renovation. Now you sat October. Soooo 8 months for a new roof. The picture shows no other renovations. Comment publication date: 9/17/26, 7:14 PM Comment source: Electrical problem delays Fernley pool opening Comment author: P Comment text: Relative of the Mayor is to over see this site. Anyone who knows Fernley KNOWS this is more of the who you are related to and know business in this town. VOTE THEM ALL OUT AND THE CALIFORNIA TRANSPLANTS. Comment publication date: 9/16/26, 10:31 PM Comment source: Lift Station Failure Released Untreated Sewage Comment author: Christopher Walsh Comment text: Could you look into the strong recurring smell around Fernley? It smells like sewage and it can be bad enough that people don’t want to be outside or open their windows. It would be helpful to get an investigative journalist help the Fernley residents get a clear answer from the City, NDEP, and any involved facilities. I was really disappointed that the smell was not disclosed by my realtor when I moved here. I enjoy Fernley and am seeing the improvements that are being made. With Appreciation Comment publication date: 9/12/26, 2:49 PM Comment source: Sewage spill near City of Fernley Municipal Well 9