Go to main contentsGo to main menu
Monday, May 18, 2026 at 6:49 PM

New law requires ignition interlock device for those charged with DUI

New law requires ignition interlock device for those charged with DUI
The Fernley Reporter

The Nevada Office of Traffic Safety announces the implementation of SB259. Beginning October 1, any individual who is arrested for DUI will be required to install an ignition interlock device (IID) on their vehicle in order to reinstate their driving privileges.

Nevada joins 30 other states in implementing an all offender mandatory ignition interlock law. An ignition interlock is a device installed in a vehicle that measures the level of alcohol in breath. Connected directly to a vehicle’s ignition system, drivers are required to blow into the attached mouthpiece to test their breath alcohol concentration. If alcohol is detected, the interlock device prevents the vehicle from starting. By law, ignition interlock devices are equipped with cameras to confirm that the individual who provided the breath is the one driving the vehicle.

As of 2017 there were approximately 2,000 installed and activated devices in Nevada. It is expected that the number of interlocks could exceed 10,000 devices within the first two years. Currently, Nevada has nine approved vendors with more than 32 service centers across the State. With the implementation of the law it is anticipated that service centers will increase. An exemption is provided if the person resides more than 100 miles from a service center. Ignition interlock devices must meet the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA) model specification and be approved by the Nevada Committee on Testing for Intoxication.

Of the 309 fatalities on Nevada’s roadways in 2017, one-third involved impairment. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety recently announced new research demonstrating that state laws requiring ignition interlock device use for all drunk driving offenders reduced drunk driving crash fatalities by 16 percent.

[pdf-embedder url="https://static2.fernleyreporter.com/data/wysiwig/uploads/2018/10/Interlock-Fact-Sheet.pdf" title="Interlock Fact Sheet"]

Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

COMMENTS
C Comment author: Carl C. HagenComment text: Maybe there is more to this story than what is reported, but it seems to me that the businesses that are causing this problem ought to be paying for this, or at least a major portion of it. Why does the County have to pay the whole bill? Just my opinion.Comment publication date: 5/7/26, 10:26 AMComment source: Storey County, Tesla partner to extend I-80 Patrick on-rampComment author: Alan ReederComment text: Great guy, laughed easily, had fun with his students, enjoyed our time together at FHS!Comment publication date: 4/23/26, 10:23 PMComment source: Howard David JacksonComment author: Jack & Nancy CookComment text: Wonderful man. Created a precious family with Linda. Will always respect and admire his contribution to teaching at FHS.Comment publication date: 4/18/26, 10:27 AMComment source: Howard David JacksonComment author: JeffDickersonComment text: Very well reported, even though our motion was denied.Comment publication date: 4/15/26, 11:05 AMComment source: Judge allows Fernley City Council to proceed with corrective agenda item in Lau expulsion caseComment author: Todd fossumComment text: Hi my name is todd fossum i'm clarence's stepson, I was wondering if he had any siblings. I think he said he had a sister that just survived cancer. If she can get ahold of me or any buddy, my number is 916. 3 4 3 1 1 7 7.Thank you have a blessed dayComment publication date: 1/16/26, 4:33 PMComment source: Clarence L Shields C Comment author: Carl HagenComment text: So just curious, what is the point of a franchise agreement if it is not exclusive?Comment publication date: 12/15/25, 4:18 PMComment source: Council approves non-exclusive franchise agreement for waste collection
Community Foundation