Go to main contentsGo to main menu
Monday, July 13, 2026 at 5:54 PM
Ad

NV Energy asks PUC to reconsider decision to reallocate $2.92 million annual rate savings to new solar metering customers

NV Energy asks PUC to reconsider decision to reallocate $2.92 million annual rate savings to new solar metering customers
The Fernley Reporter

NV Energy on Jan. 12 formally requested that the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada (PUCN) reconsider its December 2016 decision in the Sierra Pacific Power Company general rate case. The company is required by Nevada law to file detailed cost information every three years so the PUCN may set the rates that northern Nevada customers will pay for electricity and gas service. The December 2016 PUCN order establishes customer rates for the three-year period beginning Jan. 1, 2017 ending Dec. 31, 2019.

In October 2016,  NV Energy worked with a broad coalition of customers and intervenors in the rate case process to reach an agreement to lower annual electricity rates for residential and small general service customers by approximately $2.92 million annually, or a total of $8.77 million over the three-year period the current electricity rates are effective. Importantly, the agreement provided that these cost savings would be shared across a broad base of northern Nevada electric customers.

The December 2016 PUCN order directs NV Energy to reallocate this savings to future new solar net metering customers (1,250 if all residential). In its filing, the company argues that the December order takes the savings that were intended for a larger customer base and directs them to this small subset of future solar net metering customers.

The company’s filing also notes that the decision to apply the cost savings to this single class of private solar net metering customers is inconsistent with the October 2016 agreement reached with the Regulatory Operations Staff of the PUCN, the Bureau of Consumer Protection, Northern Nevada Industrial Electric Users, Northern Nevada Utility Customers, Newmont Mining, a coalition of local governmental entities, Nevadans for Clean Affordable Reliable Energy and Vote Solar.

In its filing, NV Energy acknowledges the difficult decisions the PUCN faced in a very complex legal proceeding that was subject to significant evidence, testimony and diverging viewpoints. The company commended the PUCN for acknowledging in its order the following important findings:

  • Net metering customers do not “go off the grid” and should be treated as a separate class of customers because they use the electric grid both to get and to deliver electricity to the grid.

  • The establishment of a fair and equitable pricing structure is important to all Sierra Pacific electric customers, including those who make the decision to utilize private solar generation and those who do not.

  • Credit for excess electricity energy that is delivered to the grid by private generation solar customers should be valued at a rate that is competitive with other solar options available to NV Energy. The PUCN establishes that competitive rate, in the short term, at 2.5 cents per kilowatt hour.


The PUCN has 40 days to grant or deny the request.

Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

COMMENTS
Comment author: Kayla Allen Comment text: Suzie was a wonderful woman. I was pleased to call her my "godmother" as she helped me to become a better version of myself. I think about her a lot. Comment publication date: 7/10/26, 8:31 PM Comment source: Susanne Lynn Foster Comment author: Sheena Nash Comment text: After the trivia night is over, I would love for you to print the questions. I grew up in Fernley and would be interested to see how many answers I know. The coin is beautiful. Congrats on 25 years as a city! Comment publication date: 6/22/26, 1:38 PM Comment source: City of Fernley planning 25th anniversary celebration with three days of community events C Comment author: Carl C. Hagen Comment text: Maybe there is more to this story than what is reported, but it seems to me that the businesses that are causing this problem ought to be paying for this, or at least a major portion of it. Why does the County have to pay the whole bill? Just my opinion. Comment publication date: 5/7/26, 10:26 AM Comment source: Storey County, Tesla partner to extend I-80 Patrick on-ramp Comment author: Alan Reeder Comment text: Great guy, laughed easily, had fun with his students, enjoyed our time together at FHS! Comment publication date: 4/23/26, 10:23 PM Comment source: Howard David Jackson Comment author: Jack & Nancy Cook Comment text: Wonderful man. Created a precious family with Linda. Will always respect and admire his contribution to teaching at FHS. Comment publication date: 4/18/26, 10:27 AM Comment source: Howard David Jackson Comment author: JeffDickerson Comment text: Very well reported, even though our motion was denied. Comment publication date: 4/15/26, 11:05 AM Comment source: Judge allows Fernley City Council to proceed with corrective agenda item in Lau expulsion case
Community Foundation