Go to main contentsGo to main menu
Wednesday, May 13, 2026 at 5:34 PM

City of Fernley, BOR file joint request for mediation of city’s lawsuit over lining of canal

City of Fernley, BOR file joint request for mediation of city’s lawsuit over lining of canal
The Bureau of Reclamation is continuing work to prepare for the lining of the TCID canal through a portion of Fernley, while the City of Fernley has filed an amended complaint in its lawsuit to stop the project. (Robert Perea, The Fernley Reporter)

Robert Perea, The Fernley Reporter

Following the amended complaint filed by the City of Fernley June 1 and a response filed June 15 by the Bureau of Reclamation, the two parties have jointly filed a request for mediation to discuss a settlement of the City’s lawsuit to stop the lining of a portion of the Truckee-Carson Irrigation District Canal through Fernley.

The City filed the amended complaint after a ruling by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that the District Court in the case, Miranda Du, erred in not allowing the city to amend its complaint when she dismissed the city’s lawsuit last December, then denied the city’s petition to amend the complaint on Jan. 10.

According to the joint petition requesting mediation, the parties met and conferred on July 13 regarding case scheduling and the possibility for settlement. As a result of that discussion, the parties believe that a settlement conference mediated by a magistrate judge may be helpful in resolving the case.

In the petition, the parties jointly request that the Court enter an order referring the matter to a magistrate judge to conduct a mediated settlement conference. In the event that the settlement conference does not successfully resolve this case, the parties will jointly submit a proposed scheduling order within 14 days of the conclusion of the mediated settlement process.

Judge Du dismissed the City’s original lawsuit, ruling that the City’s interests in the case were economic, not environmental. The City filed the amended complaint June 1 to reiterate its environmental claims. In its response, the BOR denies that the City is entitled to its requested relief, and asks the Court to dismiss the City’s complaint and render judgment against the City.


Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

COMMENTS
C Comment author: Carl C. HagenComment text: Maybe there is more to this story than what is reported, but it seems to me that the businesses that are causing this problem ought to be paying for this, or at least a major portion of it. Why does the County have to pay the whole bill? Just my opinion.Comment publication date: 5/7/26, 10:26 AMComment source: Storey County, Tesla partner to extend I-80 Patrick on-rampComment author: Alan ReederComment text: Great guy, laughed easily, had fun with his students, enjoyed our time together at FHS!Comment publication date: 4/23/26, 10:23 PMComment source: Howard David JacksonComment author: Jack & Nancy CookComment text: Wonderful man. Created a precious family with Linda. Will always respect and admire his contribution to teaching at FHS.Comment publication date: 4/18/26, 10:27 AMComment source: Howard David JacksonComment author: JeffDickersonComment text: Very well reported, even though our motion was denied.Comment publication date: 4/15/26, 11:05 AMComment source: Judge allows Fernley City Council to proceed with corrective agenda item in Lau expulsion caseComment author: Todd fossumComment text: Hi my name is todd fossum i'm clarence's stepson, I was wondering if he had any siblings. I think he said he had a sister that just survived cancer. If she can get ahold of me or any buddy, my number is 916. 3 4 3 1 1 7 7.Thank you have a blessed dayComment publication date: 1/16/26, 4:33 PMComment source: Clarence L Shields C Comment author: Carl HagenComment text: So just curious, what is the point of a franchise agreement if it is not exclusive?Comment publication date: 12/15/25, 4:18 PMComment source: Council approves non-exclusive franchise agreement for waste collection
Community Foundation